Models of Care in the Transition From the Secondary to the Primary Sector Among the Frailest Elderly (NCT03796923) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Models of Care in the Transition From the Secondary to the Primary Sector Among the Frailest Elderly
Denmark3,340 participantsStarted 2018-01-01
Plain-language summary
In most Western countries the elderly population increases rapidly. In Denmark, the population of elderly aged 75 years or older may amount to nearly 15 % of the entire population in 2050 compared to 9 % today (2017). A large part of the elderly population is at high risk of hospitalization including more admissions and increased morbidity and mortality. The number of hospital beds is declining persistently, calling for shorter lengths of stay (LOS). Increasingly complex treatments now take place outside hospital. Presently, many Danish regional hospitals establish geriatric wards and other geriatric in-hospital and outpatient services to overcome these challenges. The aim of the present PhD-study is to investigate the effects of different models of transitional care among the frailest elderly patients.
Who can participate
Age range
75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 75 years or older
* Living within the municipality of Aarhus (except for the control group, see below)
* MPI-score = 2 (moderate frailty) or MPI score = 3 (severe frailty)
Exclusion Criteria
* Included in any other kind of follow-up schemes
* Declared terminally ill or undergoing palliative care at admission
* Admitted from one specific temporary nursing home with geriatric medical assistance
* Discharge or transfer to another department, including hospice
* MPI-score = 1 (low frailty)
* Discharged to one specific temporary nursing home with geriatric medical assistance
* The patient does not want a visit after discharge
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.