UnknownNot Applicable

Clinical Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction of Shade Matching Between Natural Teeth and Monolithic All-ceramic Crowns Fabricated From Two Materials

10 participantsStarted 2019-01

Plain-language summary

evaluation of color difference between zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (celtra press) VS lithium disilicate (Emax) in relation to natural tooth structure to determine which monolithic material will provide restoration with exact shade and optical properties as natural tooth structure.

Who can participate

Age range20 Years – 45 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Exclusion criteria

✕. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.
✕. Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
✕. Pregnant women's to avoid any complication that may occur in dental office due to pregnancy or due to injected anesthetic solution.
✕. Patients with psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation
✕. Patients have no opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration\\
✕. Patients suffer from parafunctional habits.
✕. deep discoloration of abutment .
✕. Smokers and heavy caffeine consumers.

What they're measuring

Color match

Timeframe: immediately after crown cementation

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03779607

SponsorCairo University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2019-11

Contact for this trial

mohamed bekhiet, master degree student

01224238808 mohamed.bekhet@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Natural Optical Properties trials