Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) consists of a triad of gait disturbance, cognitive deterioration, and urinary incontinence and is characterized by enlarged cerebral ventricles. Current treatment recommendations are based on surgical diversion of Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), by a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. When patients are appropriately selected, shunting for NPH has a sustained effect in one-half to two-thirds of patients with a reasonable complication rate. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of shunt surgery consists largely of observational studies with relatively short-term follow-up. With regards to the adverse effects of shunting, even though decreased substantially in recent years, shunt complications are still common. Recent studies report ten to twenty-two percent of serious adverse effects following shunt surgery, mainly subdural hematoma (SDH) requiring surgery, infection, and cerebral infarction or hemorrhage. Most complication occur in the first year after the procedure. Many others suffer from adverse events that considered non-serious, such as postural headache and asymptomatic SDH. Since shunt complications are common and potentially severe, there is a need for a better way to identify those patients that will likely benefit from shunting, and find alternative treatments for those unwilling or unable to withstand surgery. Acetazolamide has been shown to reduce the production of CSF in clinical cases of raised intracranial pressure. It is considered the drug of choice for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). Intuitively, acetazolamide can be effective for the treatment of NPH by reducing the volume of CSF in the brain, and serve as a medical alternative to shunting. Few case reports and small series demonstrated improvement in MRI abnormalities in NPH-patients after administrating the medication. This open-label study will examine the feasibility and effectiveness of acetazolamide in NPH-diagnosed patients who are shunt-candidates. Patients will be treated from time of diagnosis, and gait and cognition will be evaluated after 2-6 weeks. This trial would possibly pave the way to a larger randomized placebo-controlled trials, and perhaps offer a medical alternative to surgery for elderly patients and for patients for which operation is contraindicated.
Age range
50 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change from Baseline Gait
Timeframe: Baseline, week 4
Change from Baseline Balance
Timeframe: Baseline, week 4