CompletedNot Applicable

Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Pediatric Anesthesia

Czechia501 participantsStarted 2019-01-01

Plain-language summary

Videolaryngoscopy can lead to superior airway conditions and to the possible higher success compared to standard direct laryngoscopy. Patient will be randomized to the interventional group (videolaryngoscopy) and control group (direct laryngoscopy). The first attempt success rate, time to first end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) wave, overall success rate, incidence of aspiration, bradycardia, desaturation a overall complications will be monitored.

Who can participate

Age range29 Days – 19 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Pediatric patients scheduled for elective surgery * Planned tracheal intubation for airway management during surgery * Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Emergency surgery * Other airway management plan * age outside the predefined limits * Informed consent not signed

What they're measuring

First intubation attempt success rate

Timeframe: Intraoperatively

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03747250

SponsorBrno University Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2021-01-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Tracheal Intubation Morbidity trials