Immediate Implants in Maxillary Premolar Region Using Xenograft vs Allograft (NCT03716323) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Immediate Implants in Maxillary Premolar Region Using Xenograft vs Allograft
42 participantsStarted 2018-11
Plain-language summary
Immediate implant placement has the disadvantage of difficulty in obtaining primary stability, lack of adequate soft tissue coverage and also the control of the implant position is difficult in addition to the cost of the graft. Autogenous bone graft is considered to be the golden standard for grafting as it has osteoconductive , osteoinductive and osteogenic functions , however it has the problems of donor site morbidity , the need for two surgeries as well as post operative swelling and discomfort of the patient , so alternative bone grafts as allografts and xenografts, has been introduced.
Who can participate
Age range25 Years – 60 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adult patients with badly broken teeth in upper premolar zone indicated for extraction, presence of at least 3 mm of bone beyond the root apex to guarantee implant primary stability, implant placement within the alveoli confines.
* Both sexes.
* No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
* No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Presence of fenestrations or dehiscence of the residual bony walls after extraction.
* Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
* Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
* Psychiatric problems
* Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site.