CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Two Miniscrew Anchored Maxillary Protraction Protocols

Brazil35 participantsStarted 2017-06-09

Plain-language summary

This study evaluates the dentoskeletal effects produced by two maxillary protraction protocols in adolescent patients. Half of participants will be treated with a tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne expanders as anchorage in the maxillary arch. Miniscrews will be used as anchorage in the mandibular arch for both groups.

Who can participate

Age range9 Years – 13 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Both sexes; * Ages ranging from 9 to 13 years old; * Class III malocclusion; * Mandibular canines erupted. Exclusion Criteria: * Previous orthodontic treatment; * Cleft lip and palate; * Craniofacial syndromes; * Systemic and/or neurological diseases.

What they're measuring

Maxillary sagittal skeletal discrepancy

Timeframe: 12 months

Mandibular sagittal skeletal discrepancy

Timeframe: 12 months

Vertical skeletal discrepancy

Timeframe: 12 months

Teeth discrepancy

Timeframe: 12 months

Soft tissue discrepancy

Timeframe: 12 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03712007

SponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2019-08-10

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Malocclusion, Angle Class III trials