Background. Emergency department (ED) overcrowding represents a significant public health problem in developed countries. Frequent users of the emergency departments (FUEDs; reporting 5 or more ED visits in the past year) are often affected by medical, psychological, social, and substance use problems and account for a disproportionately high number of ED visits. Past research indicates that the case management (CM) intervention is a promising way to reduce ED overcrowding and improve FUEDs' quality of life. There is, however, very limited knowledge about how to disseminate and implement this intervention on a large scale to diverse clinical settings, including community hospitals and non-academic centers. This research project aims to implement a CM intervention tailored to FUEDs in the public hospitals with ED in the French-speaking region of Switzerland and to evaluate both the implementation process and effectiveness of the CM intervention. Methods. This research project will examine both implementation and clinical outcomes. The implementation part of the study will describe quantitatively and qualitatively factors that influence the implementation process; the investigators will also examine implementation effectiveness (i.e., whether the implementation of the CM intervention in the ED was successful or not). The clinical part of the study will evaluate participants' trajectories on clinical variables (e.g., quality of life, ED use) after receiving the CM intervention. Discussion. This research project will contribute to implementation science by providing key insights into the processes for implementing CM into broader practice. This research project is also likely to have both clinical and public health implications.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Adoption rate as assessed by the number of hospitals included in the research project divided by the number of hospitals invited to participate
Timeframe: An average of 6 months
Reach as assessed by the number of patients receiving the CM intervention divided by the total number of eligible patients at the operation phase
Timeframe: An average of 18 months
Reach as assessed by the number of patients receiving the CM intervention divided by the total number of eligible patients at the sustainability phase
Timeframe: An average of 36 months
Level of the CM intervention integration as assessed with the Normalization MeAsure Development survey (NoMad) at the operation phase [5]
Timeframe: An average of 18 months
Level of the CM intervention integration as assessed with the Normalization MeAsure Development survey (NoMad) at the sustainability phase [5]
Timeframe: An average of 36 months
Level of normalization of the CM intervention as assessed with the Measure of Inner Context Sustainment (MICS; in development and testing) at the operation phase
Timeframe: An average of 18 months
Level of normalization of the CM intervention as assessed with the Measure of Inner Context Sustainment (MICS; in development and testing) at the sustainability phase
Timeframe: An average of 36 months
Change in the number of emergency department visits between baseline and 12 months follow-up assessments over the 12 months study period among FUEDs receiving the CM intervention
Timeframe: Baseline and 12-month follow-up assessments
Trajectories in quality of life over the 12 months study period among FUEDs receiving the CM intervention as assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life - Bref scale (WHOQOL-BREF) [6] (among FUEDs receiving the CM intervention).
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments