Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals (LGBTI) present increased morbidity compared to the general population, which is attributed to healthcare discrimination and lack of LGBT-specific expertise, especially in high-stigma countries. Motivated by fear, Romanian LGBTI conceal their identities and report significantly more barriers to healthcare access than heterosexuals. Poor mental health, specifically anxiety and depression, is elevated for Romanian LGBTI, and associated with poor physical health (e.g., HIV risk, alcohol abuse.) However, LGBT-competent mental health professionals (MHPs) are nearly non-existent in Romania, and thus the negative impact of homophobia on mental health cannot be ameliorated. Given that a pilot of an in-person LGBT-affirmative MHP training recently tested in Romania showed significant receptivity and increased competence among MHPs, this training is ripe for testing its feasibility and efficacy in creating significant change via mobile delivery, in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Proving the efficacy of this first mobile training and supervision model has high potential for cost-effective and expeditious boundless dissemination. Aim 1 will test the relative feasibility and efficacy of the mHealth MHP training by conducting an RCT comparing a mobile training (MT) of MHP LGBT-competency program (n=60) to the equivalent in-person training (IPT) (n=60) recently piloted. Both programs' content and structure will be identical (2-day trainings and two boosters 6 months apart). At baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months, all MHPs' LGBT-related attitudes, knowledge of LGBT health needs and clinical practice, and LGBT caseload will be assessed in a mobile fashion. In Aim 2 will test the efficacy of a companion mHealth supervision and consultation program in maintaining LGBT competency and enhancing LGBT-friendly practice. Half of the MHPs in each group will receive mHealth supervision and expert consultation program, consisting of monthly 2-hour virtual group meetings to discuss case studies, in order to determine the added benefit of mobile supervision. At the end of the study, 10 MHPs will provide interview-based program feedback. In Aim 3, the investigators will build mHealth research capacity among MHPs by demonstrating how to integrate mobile data collection tools in clinical practice to monitor client progress for personalized treatment plans.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Changes in attitudes towards LGBT patients as assessed by the Attitudes Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
Timeframe: Change in negative attitudes (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Changes in knowledge for LGBT competent practice as assessed by the Knowledge Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
Timeframe: Change in Knowledge (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Changes in clinical skills as assessed by the Clinical Skills subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
Timeframe: Change in Clinical Skills (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Changes in homophobic attitudes towards LGBT patients as assessed by the Modern Homonegativity Scale
Timeframe: Change in homophobic attitudes (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Changes in implicit bias attitudes towards homosexual (gay or lesbian) individuals as assessed by the Sexual Orientation Implicit Association Test (Sexual Orientation IAT)
Timeframe: Change in implicit bias (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )