Together with materials and type of retention, the stability of the implant abutment connection represents one of the key factor for the success rate of an implant supported restoration. The recent diffusion of high quality and easy to use CAD/CAM systems has contributed to market launch of a number of competing companies that offer the so called "clonical" or "compatible" restorative components. Although they are claimed to be identical, the original abutments are supposed to present maximum accuracy and consequently lower microleakage. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial will be to analyze the implant abutment junction stability comparing implant-supported crowns restored with original components and compatible non-original abutments. The hypothesis is that original components will present significantly better stability than non-original abutments.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Biological complications
Timeframe: 1 year
Biomechanical complications
Timeframe: 1 year