UnknownNot Applicable

Primary Urethral Realignment vs. Suprapubic Cystostomy for Initial Management of Pediatric Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury

42 participantsStarted 2018-06-01

Plain-language summary

It is prospective randomized comparative clinical trial comparing primary urethral realignment vs. suprapubic cystostomy in initial management of pediatric pelvic fracture urethral injury regarding: 1. The success rate after initial intervention. 2. The need for urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group. 3. The success rate of urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group.

Who can participate

Age range1 Year – 18 Years

SexMALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Male children less than 18 years presenting with pelvic fracture urethral injury Exclusion Criteria: * Associated bladder neck injury. * Associated rectal injury. * Late presentation \>2weeks since trauma. * History of previous urethral intervention.

What they're measuring

The success rate after initial intervention (realignment or suprapubic cystostomy).

Timeframe: 3 months after initial intervention.

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03468387

SponsorAssiut University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2021-06-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Urethral Injury trials