Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable

Intravascular Imaging- Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Complex Coronary Artery Disease

South Korea1,639 participantsStarted 2018-05-10

Plain-language summary

The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes between intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions.

Who can participate

Age range19 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

✓. True bifurcation lesion (Medina 1,1,1/1,0,1/0,1,1) with side branch ≥2.5mm size
✓. Chronic total occlusion (≥3 months) as target lesion
✓. Unprotected LM disease PCI (LM ostium, body, distal LM bifurcation including non-true bifurcation)
✓. Long coronary lesions (implanted stent ≥38 mm in length)
✓. Multi-vessel PCI (≥2 vessels treated at one PCI session)
✓. Multiple stents needed (≥3 more stent per patient)
✓. In-stent restenosis lesion as target lesion
✓. Severely calcified lesion (encircling calcium in angiography)

What they're measuring

Target vessel Failure

Timeframe: 1-year after last patient enrollment

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03381872

SponsorSamsung Medical Center

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2022-05-10

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Coronary Artery Disease trials