Dental model cast accuracy can be affected by many variables as tray material, impression material and time elapsed before pouring the impression. All these factors would affect the accuracy of the surgical guide Impression inversion with markers technique avoids the dimension changes that may happen from pouring of the dental model cast. Also it saves time as no need for optical scan of the model cast and for scan appliance even in cases of multiple restoration. Adding markers to impression tray ensures an accurate merge even if the patient has restored dentition that may cause scatter during the CT/CBCT scan. This study will is for Assessment of the Accuracy of Surgical Guide designed from Dental Model Optical Scan versus Impression Inversion with Markers techniques in Computer Guided Implantology.
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Evaluation of angular deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position according to scanning protocol "optical scan of the model" Versus "impression inversion" using CBCT.
Timeframe: Immediate post operative