Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment in GIOPVCF (NCT03330340) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment in GIOPVCF
106 participantsStarted 2017-12-01
Plain-language summary
Based on the case reports and other literature, the investigators hypothesize that using PVP for treating GIOPVCF is associated with increased risk of vertebral refractures and does not provide further benefits compared to conservative treatments.
The overall objective of this prospective cohort study is to compare the efficacy of PVP and conservative treatment for GIOPVCF. The evaluation of efficacy of therapy includes: 1) the incidence of vertebral refractures; 2) therapeutic effects (pain relief and health-related life quality) and 3) complications.
The results from study will be written in English and disseminated widely through scholarly presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and other written communications.
Who can participate
Age range
55 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Patients have fresh vertebral compression fractures regarding spine radiograph (minimum 15% height loss; level of fracture at Th5 or lower; bone edema on MRI, focal tenderness on VCF level).
. Patients have back pain for 6 weeks or less, with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score equal or less than 5.
. GCs consumption for more than 3 months (prednisone equivalent or more than 5 mg daily).
. Reduced bone density with T-scores equal or less than -1.
. Age at 55 or higher.
Exclusion criteria
. Concurrent other secondary osteoporosis.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.