Peri-implant infections are severe complications after internal fracture fixation surgery. Detection of causative agents of orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI) is demanding. Several authors reported increased identification rates of bacterial prevalence using different sonication procedures compared to standard tissue cultures samples, especially for low grade infections. On the author hand, contamination of implants without clinical signs of infection is reported in up to 30% during implant removals after uneventful fracture healing. The raised general questions are: 1.) Is a positive microbiological finding the result of contamination during the index surgery or during implant removal? 2.) Does contaminated implants without clinical or serological signs of infection have a pathological value?
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Detection rate of syndesmotic screw contamination using a sonication procedure compared to standard wound swabs
Timeframe: six weeks