CompletedNot Applicable

A mRUS Validation Study for Nail-treated Fractures of Long Bones and a TUS Exploratory Study for Nail and Plate-treated Fractures of Long Bones

Germany173 participantsStarted 2017-09-01

Plain-language summary

Early intervention attempts to shorten protracted delayed union (DU) or prevent non-union (NU) fractures are hampered by lack of validated quantitative assessment tools for bone fracture healing during normal and delayed healing processes. In actual practice, sequential X-rays usually follow a pre-determined time interval in patients with fractures.They constitute the best available state of the art used by surgeons to assess the fracture healing course. In an attempt to improve between raters reliability of radiographic assessment of healing, studies have explored a novel radiographic assessment for tibial shaft fractures, the Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures (RUST). The RUST assesses the presence of bridging callus and a fracture line on each of four cortices (seen on anterior-posterior and lateral views). This callus based scoring system has been since extended to other bones than the tibia in a retrospective case series. It has been renamed modified radiological union score (mRUS) and has shown potential value in bone healing measurement. Based on an initial retrospective study in nail-treated fractures, the first objective of the present investigation is to prospectively validate mRUS as a tool to identify patients at increased risk of DU and NU within the first 75-110 days after fracture occurrence. This prospective validation will be performed on a retrospective cohort of patients having sustained long bone fractures, including both upper and lower extremities. A further objective of the present investigation is to apply the scoring system to tomographic imaging in case of nail/plate treated fractures, deriving a tomographic union score (TUS) and first assess its potential value in bone healing for fractures treated by nails/plates.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years – 80 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female adult patient (\>18 and \< 80 years old) * Patient with nail(s) (for mRUS validation study and TUS exploratory study) or plate(s) (for TUS exploratory study) treated long bone fractures, corresponding to the following OA/OTA classification: 11-A, 12-A, -B and -C, 13-A, 21-A, 22-A, -B and -C, , 31-A3, 32-A, -B and -C, 33-A 41-A2 and A3, 42-A, -B and -C and 43-A * Patient for whom outcome of fracture is known * For the mRUS validation study, patient with one follow up X-ray imaging performed 75-110 days after fracture occurrence * For the TUS exploratory study, patient with one follow up CT-scan imaging performed 75-110 days after the fracture occurrence Exclusion Criteria: * Bone infection diagnosed between time of the fracture occurrence and the X-Ray or CT-scan imaging performed 75-110 days after the fracture occurrence * Previous fracture and previous surgery on the fractured bone * Bone tumour or history of bone tumour * Bone metastasis * Known evidence for ongoing metabolic bone disease (e.g. chronic renal failure, hyper or hypoparathyroidism, rickets, Paget's disease of bone, inherited or congenital bone abnormalities) * Patient with current traumatic brain injury

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

mRUS assessed on X-Ray

Timeframe: 75-110 days after fracture occurrence

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03286270

SponsorBone Therapeutics S.A

Sponsor typeINDUSTRY

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2018-04-27

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Delayed Union Fracture trials