The purpose was to assess the accuracy and clinical validation of virtual planning and surgical template in mandible distraction osteogenesis. Patients with hemifacial microsomia were enrolled. Virtual planning and simulation were performed on three-dimensional models. Distraction was simulated on virtual model and the new morphology of the mandible was predicted. The position and direction of the distractor was determined to achieve the optimal morphology. The templates were designed based on virtual planning and manufactured using three-dimensional printing technique. The template is designed to assist the surgeon to perform the osteotomy and predrill the screw holes to guide the distractor position. The outcome evaluation was completed by comparing planned outcomes with postoperative outcomes. Linear and angular differences for the distractor was measured.
Age range
6 Years – 60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Linear differences of the distractor position
Timeframe: within latency period (5-7 days after the surgery)
angular differences of the distractor vector
Timeframe: within latency period (5-7 days after the surgery)