Drug Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents for Treatment of Symptomatic Extracranial Vertebral … (NCT03201432) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 2/3
Drug Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents for Treatment of Symptomatic Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenosis
160 participantsStarted 2014-05
Plain-language summary
Stroke is one of the important causes of disability and death in the world, in which more than half were ischemic strokes. About 1/4 of the ischemic stroke occurred in the vertebral basilar artery system, especially when in the presence of extracranial proximal vertebral artery stenosis. Vertebral artery stenting is a minimally invasive method for the reconstruction of vertebral artery stenosis and the early clinical studies showed that it was feasible, safe and effective, but the high rate of restenosis has become a bottleneck restricting its development. Previous systematic review had suggested that the drug eluting stent might reduce the incidence of restenosis of vertebral artery. However, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of bare metal stents and drug eluting stents on the prevention of restenosis remains absent.
Who can participate
Age range
40 Years – 80 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Symptomatic posterior circulation ischemia(Vertebral basilar artery system TIA or non-disabling ischemic stroke)result from the stenosis in the extracranial proximal vertebral artery stenosis.
* Atherosclerotic extracranial proximal vertebral artery stenosis demonstrated by angiography(any of the following): 1) bilateral vertebral artery stenosis ≥70%, or vertebral artery stenosis ≥70% concomitant occlusion of contralateral vertebral artery; 2) superior lateral vertebral artery stenosis ≥70%; 3) non-superior lateral vertebral artery stenosis ≥50%, but the vertebral artery was directly extended to the posterior inferior cerebellar artery on this side and symptoms were related to insufficiency of the ipsilateral posterior inferior cerebellar artery.
Exclusion Criteria:
* 1\) lesions characteristics (such as diffuse lesions) which was not suitable for interventional treatment, or unstable condition that cannot tolerate the interventional therapy;
* 2\) vertebral artery stenosis caused by non atherosclerosis disease: Takayasu arteritis or other diseases;
* 3\) severe stroke within 3 months;
* 4\) contraindicated using contrast agents: such as chronic renal insufficiency or had serious contrast agents allergy history;
* 5\) malignant tumor;
* 6\) with Alzheimer's disease or mental illness previously or currently ;
* 7\) patients or family members refuse the operation.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.