A Study to Determine the Abuse Potential of Single Oral Doses of Lemborexant Compared to Zolpidem… (NCT03158025) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 1
A Study to Determine the Abuse Potential of Single Oral Doses of Lemborexant Compared to Zolpidem, Suvorexant and Placebo in Healthy, Non-Dependent, Recreational Sedative Users
Canada39 participantsStarted 2017-04-19
Plain-language summary
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the abuse potential of lemborexant (E2006) in comparison to placebo and 2 controls with known abuse potential (ie, zolpidem and suvorexant) with similar indications (zolpidem and suvorexant) or mechanisms of action (suvorexant).
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 55 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Ability to distinguish orally administered zolpidem 30 mg and suvorexant 40 mg from placebo on the bipolar Drug Liking (at this moment) Visual analog scale (VAS), defined as a ≥15 point peak increase for Drug Liking in response to zolpidem and suvorexant relative to placebo following drug administration. A peak score of ≥65 must be indicated on the bipolar measure of Drug Liking (at this moment) in response to zolpidem and suvorexant
. Display an acceptable placebo response, defined as a VAS response between 40 to 60 inclusive, for peak (Emax) Drug Liking (at this moment)
. Demonstrate responses to zolpidem and suvorexant that are consistent with discrimination relative to placebo on other subjective measures, as judged by the study center staff
. Tolerate study treatment (eg, no episodes of vomiting within the first 3 hours postdose) and demonstrate ability to complete the pharmacodynamic assessments (eg, no unarousable sedation within 4 hours postdose)
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Mean peak Maximum Effect (Emax) score for Drug Liking on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 (all Day 1), and 24 hours (Day 2) post-dose of each treatment cycle (up to 11 weeks)