UnknownNot Applicable

Zero-fluoroscopic Navigation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Navigation for Double-chamber Pacemaker Implantation

China100 participantsStarted 2013-01

Plain-language summary

This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of Ensite-NavX zero-fluoroscopic navigation system to conventional fluoroscopic X-ray approach as to performing double-chamber pacemaker implantation.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 90 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Sick Sinus Syndrome * complete Atrioventricular Block * high degree second Degree Atrioventricular Block * Bradycardia Exclusion Criteria: * pacemaker replacement * severe structural cardiac malformations * severe cardiac enlargement * venous malformations

What they're measuring

Success rate

Timeframe: 3 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03118427

SponsorTongji Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2018-12

Contact for this trial

Yan Wang, PhD

86-027-83663280 newswangyan@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Sick Sinus Syndrome trials