This randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared the efficacy between the Social Enterprise Intervention (SEI) and Individual Placement and Support (IPS) with homeless youth with mental illness. Methods: Non-probability quota sampling sampling was used to recruit 72 homeless youth from one agency, who were randomized to the SEI (n=36) or IPS (n=36) conditions.
Age range
16 Years – 24 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change in depression between baseline and follow-up (using the Adult Self-Report)
Timeframe: 20 months
Change in social support between baseline and follow-up (using the Adult Self-Report)
Timeframe: 20 months
Change in housing stability status between baseline and follow-up (using a 3-item self-report measure of housing status)
Timeframe: 20 months
Change in self-esteem between baseline and follow-up (using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale)
Timeframe: 20 months