A Comparison of Cataract Surgery Alone and Cataract Surgery With iStent (NCT03106181) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
A Comparison of Cataract Surgery Alone and Cataract Surgery With iStent
Australia93 participantsStarted 2018-02-01
Plain-language summary
This study aims to recruit patients of the Glaucoma Investigative and Research Unit (GIRU) of Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH) with mild to moderate glaucoma who are due to undergo cataract surgery and randomise each to either cataract surgery or combined cataract surgery with iStent Inject® insertion. Only patients who meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be recruited. The outcomes measures of the study will be a comparison of: 1) extent of IOP reduction; 2) reduction in number of topical glaucoma medications; 3) patient treatment satisfaction - between the two treatment groups.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* \>18 years of age
* Diagnosis of mild-to-moderate open angle glaucoma
* Presence of cataract requiring surgery
* Good understanding of both verbal and written English
* Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Recent intraocular surgery within last 3 months
* Other ocular pathology affecting vision
* Inability to complete the elements of the study, eg: coma, hemodynamic instability, ventilator dependence, that could be of concern in the investigator's judgment.
* Non-elective hospitalisation within the past 60 days that could be of concern in the investigator's judgment.
* Medical illness that in the judgment of the investigator would jeopardise the safe completion of the study. Examples include cancer, chronic inflammatory disease, chronic liver insufficiency, epilepsy, thrombocytosis.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.