TerminatedNot Applicable

In Vivo Kinematics of Scapolunate Interosseous Ligament Injuries

Stopped: Not enough research staff

1 participantsStarted 2015-09

Plain-language summary

The investigators hypothesize that there is no relationship between in vivo kinematic abnormalities and patient-rated outcomes for scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries (SLIL) The secondary null hypotheses are that: There are no kinematic differences between subjects with unilateral, symptomatic, full thickness scapholunate ligament tears in comparison to the contralateral wrist without scapholunate ligament injury. The investigators aim to answer to the below questions: * What are baseline validated outcomes for subjects with SLIL injury? * What are baseline physical measures (range of motion, Jamar Dynamometry)?

Who can participate

Age range18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * All patients with a unilateral full thickness scapholunate ligament tear diagnosed by radiographs or advanced imaging Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with a partial thickness scapholunate ligament tear * Patients with radiographic arthrosis * Patients with prior wrist injury * Pregnant women

What they're measuring

Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)

Timeframe: at enrollment

SF-12 Patient Questionnaire

Timeframe: at enrollment

DASH Questionnaire

Timeframe: at enrollment

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03017040

SponsorMassachusetts General Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2018-04-27

Results submitted2018-08-13

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Scapholunate Ligament Tear trials