Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Hip Replacement for Intracapsular Hip Fractures (NCT02998359) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Hip Replacement for Intracapsular Hip Fractures
United Kingdom300 participantsStarted 2013-08
Plain-language summary
In England each year over 9,000 people fracture their hip. Most of these are elderly females with the fracture occurring after a fall. Approximately half of these fractures are classified as intracapsular fractures because of their close proximity to the hip joint. The majority of these fractures are treated surgically by excising the broken femoral neck and removing the femoral head (ball part of the hip joint) and replacing it with an artificial hip joint. This hip replacement has traditionally been a hemiarthroplasty or sometimes termed a 'half hip replacement' in which only the ball part of the hip joint is replaced.
An alternative type of hip replacement is the full total hip replacement in which the socket part of the joint is also replaced. This is the operation that is used for replacing arthritic hips. In recent years there have been a number of randomised trials that have compared the outcome for patients with an intracapsular hip fracture treated with either a partial hip replacement (hemiarthroplasty) against those treated with a total hip replacement (THR). Results to date have suggested slightly better long term functional results for those treated with a THR, but it still remains unclear if these benefits are offset by the increased surgical complexity of the procedure and the extra cost involved for a THR.
At present the numbers of studies on this topic are too few with limited patient numbers to make any definite conclusions. This study aims to add to the research studies by comparing the two surgical procedures, to enable orthopaedic surgeons to determine the optimum surgical treatment for this common and disabling condition.
Who can participate
Age range
16 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* All patients admitted to Peterborough District Hospital with a displaced intracapsular fracture will be considered for inclusion in the study. Patients will need to be
* able to walk independently out of doors with no more than the use of a stick
* not cognitively impaired
* medically fit for anaesthesia for either procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
* • Those aged less than 50 years (these patient have an expected good long term survival and are all treated by reduction and internal fixation).
* All other patients in which the injury is to be treated by reduction and internal fixation.
* Those with impaired mobility prior to the injury (defined as not able to walk out of doors with no more than the use of a stick).
* Patients who are not considered to be medically fit for either procedure.
* Patients who decline to participate.
* Patients with senile dementia and those without the capacity to give informed consent. These patients are defined as those with a standard mental test score of lower than 5 our of 10. (These patients from previous studies have been found to be at increased risk of dislocation and post-operative complications after THR and this method of treatment is not recommended for this group).
* Patients admitted when MJP is not available to supervise treatment.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Change in a mobility score
Timeframe: at one year from injury
Trial details
NCT IDNCT02998359
SponsorPeterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust