Improving Outcomes Using Technology for Children Who Are DHH (NCT02998164) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable
Improving Outcomes Using Technology for Children Who Are DHH
United States154 participantsStarted 2016-10
Plain-language summary
This study evaluates the efficacy of using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) technology for enhancing language development in children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Half of the participants will receive AAC technology with their speech and language therapy and half will continue with their usual care models.
Who can participate
Age range
3 Years – 10 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* documented permanent bilateral hearing loss with severity levels clinically defined in any range (mild to profound);
* identified with a language gap;
* currently receiving speech-language therapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
* primary language other than English
* significant motor impairments
* nonverbal IQ \<60
* children with severe communication disorders (i.e. autism spectrum disorders).
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Syntax
Timeframe: Change between baseline and 24 weeks
2
semantics
Timeframe: Change between baseline and 24 weeks
3
Discourse
Timeframe: Assessing change between baseline and 24 weeks.
Trial details
NCT IDNCT02998164
SponsorChildren's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati