Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Nailing of 3 and 4 Part Proximal Humerus Fractures (NCT02944058) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Nailing of 3 and 4 Part Proximal Humerus Fractures
Norway79 participantsStarted 2016-10
Plain-language summary
The purpose of the project is to compare the management of 3 and 4 part proximal humerus fractures (PHF) with an angular stable plate (Philos) with that of an intramedullary nail (Multiloc) in light of complications, radiological, economical, functional and clinical outcome.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Patients \> 18 years
. Severe displacement, defined as malposition of at least 45⁰ of angular deviation in valgus or 30⁰ in varus in true frontal projection, regardless of whether the fracture is impacted or not. Fractures with more than 50% displacement of the head against the surgical neck
. The greater or lesser tubercles must be fractured in a 3 or 4-part fracture. The degree of displacement is not critical for inclusion.
Exclusion criteria
. Fracture more than 3 weeks' old
. Caput humeri just a thin shell or split
. Ipsilateral damage that will influence the recovery and scoring systems
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score (questionnaire) Disability of the arm, shoulder and arm score (DASH score)