CompletedNot Applicable

The Results of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With and Without Preoperative Genu Recurvatum

104 participantsStarted 2011-01

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on two groups of patients, namely one with genu recurvatum before the procedure and one without. Specifically, this study compare the number of occurrences of postoperative genu recurvatum and the postoperative hyperextension angles among the patients. Additionally, the knee scores, the pain scores, and the functional scores for the two groups of patients are compared. Materials and methods: This study prospectively followed 104 patients (114 knees) who had been treated with cemented minimally invasive surgery unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and had had a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: those without preoperative genu recurvatum (85 patients; 94 knees) and those with preoperative genu recurvatum (19 patients; 20 knees). The incidence of the postoperative genu recurvatum, the postoperative hyperextension angles, the knee scores, the pain scores, and the functional scores were recorded and compared between two groups..

Who can participate

Age range

40 Years – 90 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * The medial OA knee with older than 40 years of age, ROM greater than 90°, varus deformity less than 25°, and flexion contractures less than 20° Exclusion Criteria: * patients who were diagnosed spontaneous osteonecrosis of knee (SPONK), patients with intraoperative ACL insufficiency, post traumatic arthritis, gouty arthritis, inflammatory joints.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

hyperextension angle, the incidence of postoperative genu recurvatum

Timeframe: 2 years

Trial details

NCT IDNCT02854189

SponsorThammasat University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2013-04

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Primary Gonarthrosis trials