Invasive Candida infections are serious complications in immunocompromised patients including those undergoing treatment for cancer but occur also in patients treated in ICUs. Survival rate of invasive candidiasis is associated with early initiation of antifungal therapy (15% mortality rate for candidemic patients with antifungal therapy on day 0 related to the culture date of the first blood sample positive for yeasts compared to 41% for patients who received antifungal therapy on day 3). Up to date, no laboratory method or clinical decision rule is available for correct anticipation of invasive candidiasis which would avoid delays in appropriate antifungal therapy initiation. In clinical practice culture based methods (e.g. blood cultures) miss up to 50% of invasive candidiasis cases. Preemptive antifungal therapy is therefore often initiated in critically ill patients after Candida has been isolated from various non-sterile patient samples even without any sufficient evidence for invasive candidiasis. The disadvantages of this approach include over- and undertreatment of patients (up to 50% of candidemia cases are missed, and on the other hand 89% patients are treated unnecessarily), increased selective pressure for the development of antifungal resistance, potential risk of adverse drug reactions, and increased costs (expenses for antifungal therapy account for half of the antimicrobial medication budget in tertiary care hospitals). In addition, no survival benefit could be demonstrated by this strategy in ICU patients. The aim of this study is to identify biological markers to anticipate or support the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients, to overcome current deficiencies in detection of invasive candidiasis and consequently to differentiate between Candida spp. colonization and invasive Candida infection. The investigators intend to examine time dependent courses of potential host and pathogen derived biomarkers as well as innate or acquired predispositions for invasive candidiasis; e.g. automated (1→3) ß- D- Glucan tests, DNA in serum blood samples, pathogen recognition receptors and serum markers like interleukin (IL)-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, IL-23, Tryptophan, Kynurenine, composition of indigenous microbiota of gastrointestinal and lower respiratory tract and skin, and risk factors for invasive candidiasis like underlying diseases and treatments. The study should contribute to improved assessment of ICU patients at risk for invasive candidiasis and to improved diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients. In clinical practice the reliable differentiation between infection and colonization will allow more targeted antifungal therapy leading to enhanced antifungal treatment initiation on the one hand (in cases of true invasive candidiasis) and to reduction of unnecessary antifungal treatments and treatment costs on the other hand.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Biomarkers indicating or excluding invasive Candidiasis
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 2 years