Non-inferiority of PRO-067 Ophthalmic Solution vs GAAP Ofteno® in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (NCT02801617) | Clinical Trial Compass
TerminatedPhase 3
Non-inferiority of PRO-067 Ophthalmic Solution vs GAAP Ofteno® in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
Stopped: expiration time limit of recruitment
Mexico116 participantsStarted 2015-09
Plain-language summary
Aim: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the PRO-067 ophthalmic solution manufactured by Laboratorios Sophia S.A. de C.V. versus GAAP Ofteno® ophthalmic solution like hypotensive therapy in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Study design: a multicentric, prospective, crossover (2x2), double blind clinical study. Sample size: one hundred patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Patients in the period 1: In the first sequence 60 patients will be assigned to receive the ophthalmic solution: GAAP Ofteno ® (latanoprost 0.005%) 1 drop per day (QD) during 30 days and the second sequence 60 patients will be assigned to receive the ophthalmic solution: PRO-067 1 drop QD during 30 days in the same period. Washout period: 21 hours. Patients in the period 2: the pharmacological intervention change to the opposite therapy for 30 days.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Female or male
* Age: ≥18 years old
* Patients with primary open angle glaucoma with mild to moderate damage or ocular hypertension that were sufficiently controlled with GAAP Ofteno® (latanoprost 0.005%) within the last 60 days
* Signed Informed Consent Form
Exclusion Criteria:
* Subjects with unique eye
* Subjects with visual acuity \< 20/200
* Another kind of glaucoma disease different to primary open angle glaucoma
* corneal disturbances with impossibility to measure the intraocular pressure
* retinal alterations without control or progressive retinal disease with high risk to lost vision
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Target Intraocular Pressure (TIOP)
Timeframe: the baseline visit (day 0), Cross Over Visit (day 30) and the final visit (day 60) for both sequences
2
Number of Adverse Events.
Timeframe: it is evaluated from the baseline visit (day 1) to the security call (day 75)