Comparing Intra Uterine Synechiae Occurence Using Bipolar Energy Compared With Monopolar Energy i… (NCT02661087) | Clinical Trial Compass
WithdrawnNot Applicable
Comparing Intra Uterine Synechiae Occurence Using Bipolar Energy Compared With Monopolar Energy in Myoma Resection on Women Having Menorraghia and/or Infertility
Stopped: Principal investigator departure
Belgium, France0Started 2017-03-14
Plain-language summary
Since the development in the last few years of the bipolar energy in the surgery by hysteroscopy, the hysteroscopic treatment of the submucosal uterine myoma can be performed by use of either monopolar or bipolar current.
It seems that the use of the bipolar energy decreases the rate of adhesions but prospective data on the adhesion rate and fertility after the use of bipolar energy during the surgery are poor, and there is currently no recommendation as to the choice of technique to use. The main purpose of this study is to compare the rate of uterine adhesions six weeks after the surgical hysteroscopic treatment of uterine submucosal myoma, by using monopolar or bipolar energy. The pregnancy and spontaneous miscarriage rate will also be evaluated.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 42 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Symptomatic (menorrhagia or primary/secondary infertility) with pregnancy wishes
* One submucosal myoma, type 0 to Type II, accessible to a hysteroscopic surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
* Several submucosal myomas
* Pregnant woman
* Patient under anticoagulating treatment (anti-vitamin K-type)
* Patient with a malignant endometrial pathology
* Patient having one or more endo-uterine synechiae
* Myoma larger than 5 cm
* Uterine malformation
* Active infection, not healed
* Refusal to participate in the Protocol
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.