CompletedNot Applicable

SpineJack® Versus Conservative Treatment Study (SPICO Study)

France100 participantsStarted 2016-01-13

Plain-language summary

This study will compare two standard treatments in acute stable traumatic vertebral fractures (types A1 and A3.1 by Magerl Classification). The two treatments are as follows: 1. SpineJack® system 2. Conservative Orthopedic Management consisting of brace and pain medication.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years – 60 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

. Patient must have signed the consent form
. Male or Female between 18 and 60 years old
. One to two painful traumatic fractures, non-pathological, traumatic vertebral fracture is less than 10 days, between T11 and L5, type A1 and A3.1 according to Magerl classification. All the fractures should meet the inclusion criteria (deformity, etiology, technical possibility of performing the procedure).
. Vertebral kyphosis angle \>10°
. Patient is eligible to treatment with brace
. Technical feasibility of a SpineJack® procedure and brace 1 to 5 days after screening/baseline

Exclusion criteria

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

VAS

Timeframe: 1 and 12 months follow-up

Trial details

NCT IDNCT02657265

SponsorVexim SA

Sponsor typeINDUSTRY

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2019-05-27

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Spinal Fractures trials