CompletedPhase 4

Comparison of Low Dose Versus High Dose Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

India75 participantsStarted 2015-12

Plain-language summary

This study will be conducted to find out whether low dose or high dose cyclophosphamide therapy is effective in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis.It will also compare the side effects and risks of infection in low dose and high dose cyclophosphamide group. Half of the participants will receive a low dose cyclophosphamide for 3 months and half will receive high dose cyclophosphamide therapy monthly for 6 months followed by azathioprine 2 mg/kg.

Who can participate

Age range

16 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

. A diagnosis of SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
. Age \>16 years
. Proteinuria ≥500 mg in 24 hours/ urine routine microscopy showing active cellular casts/sediments.
. Biopsy-proven proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis of class III, IV according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) criteria.

Exclusion criteria

. Patients ever treated previously with intravenous or oral cyclophosphamide or received steroids \>15mg/day in the last 3 months.
. Patients with renal thrombotic microangiopathy, preexisting chronic renal failure, pregnancy, previous malignancy (except skin and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia), diabetes mellitus or coronary heart disease.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Assessment of Primary Renal Response

Timeframe: 12 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT02645565

SponsorJawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research

Sponsor typeOTHER_GOV

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2016-12

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Lupus Nephritis trials