Comparison of the Human Acellular Vessel (HAV) With ePTFE Grafts as Conduits for Hemodialysis (NCT02644941) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
Comparison of the Human Acellular Vessel (HAV) With ePTFE Grafts as Conduits for Hemodialysis
United States, Germany, Israel355 participantsStarted 2016-05-24
Plain-language summary
The main purpose of this study is to compare the Human Acellular Vessel (HAV) with ePTFE grafts when used for hemodialysis access.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Subjects with ESRD who need placement of an AV graft in the arm.
* Either on hemodialysis or expected to start hemodialysis within 12 weeks of study conduit implantation.
* Suitable anatomy for implantation of straight or looped conduits in either the forearm or upper arm (not crossing the elbow).
* Hemoglobin ≥8 g/dL and platelet count ≥100,000 cells/mm3 prior to Day 0 (within 35 days).
* Other hematological and biochemical parameters within a range consistent with ESRD prior to Day 0 (within 35 days).
* Adequate liver function prior to Day 0 (within 35 days).
* Female subjects must be either:
* Of non-childbearing potential Or
* Must agree to use at least one form of birth control methods for the duration of the study.
* Subject, or legal representative, able to communicate effectively with investigative staff, competent and willing to give written informed consent, and able to comply with entire study procedures including all scheduled follow-up visits.
* Life expectancy of at least 1 year.
Exclusion Criteria:
* History or evidence of severe peripheral vascular disease in the intended arm for implantation.
* Known or suspected central vein stenosis or conduit occlusion on the ipsilateral side of planned implantation, unless the stenosis is corrected prior to study conduit implantation.
* Treatment with any investigational drug or device within 60 days prior to study entry (Day 0).
* Cancer that is actively being treated with a cytotoxic agent.…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Number of Participants With Loss of Secondary Patency
Timeframe: 12 months post-implantation
2
Number of Participants With Loss of Secondary Patency
Timeframe: 18 months post-implantation
3
Number of Participants With Loss of Secondary Patency