Comparison of Efficacy Between a Newly Designed Covered Stent and Uncovered Stent for Malignant C… (NCT02640781) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Comparison of Efficacy Between a Newly Designed Covered Stent and Uncovered Stent for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction
South Korea70 participantsStarted 2015-12
Plain-language summary
Acute colorectal obstruction has been reported to occur in 7 - 29% of all colorectal malignancies, but emergent surgical decompression is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, self-expandable metal stents(SEMS) have been suggested as an alternative to surgery and effectively decompress the colonic obstruction and allow for bowel preparation and elective surgery. Theoretically, SEMSs are classified into uncovered stents and covered stents. Covered stents have the advantage of less frequent stent occlusion by tumor in-growth and the disadvantage of a high risk of stent migration, whereas uncovered stents are associated with less stent migration, although they appear to be more prone to tumor ingrowth. To overcome the drawbacks of conventional stents, a double-layered combination covered stent was developed. In the present study, the investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of the newly designed covered stent by comparing it with the uncovered stent in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction.
Who can participate
Age range
20 Years – 85 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* 20\~85-year-old patients with malignant colorectal obstruction either by primary CRC or extracolonic malignancy
* Patients with clinical obstructive symptoms confirmed by CT or colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients with evidence of bowel perforation or peritonitis
* Cause of obstruction other than malignancy (bowel adhesion or benign stricture)
* Multiple stricture
* Lower rectal cancer obstruction (AV \<5cm)
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Duration of stent patency between stent insertion and recurrence of obstructive symptoms