Several attempts have been made to refine selection criteria for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Previously proposed parameters probably do not sufficiently reflect the underlying mechanical dyssynchrony of the left ventricle (LV). Earlier work of our research group suggests that better candidate selection can rely on the direct observation or measurement of this LV mechanical dyssynchrony by means of non-invasive imaging. In this study apical rocking and other non-invasive measures of LV mechanical dyssynchrony will be applied to evaluate regional myocardial workload and metabolism, and determine their predictive value in CRT response.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) response assessed by echocardiography
Timeframe: Change of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) between baseline and 6 months after CRT implantation
CRT response assessed by echocardiography
Timeframe: Change of LVESV between baseline and 12 months after CRT implantation