CompletedNot Applicable

Retroperitoneal Packing or Angioembolization for Hemorrhage Control of Pelvic Fractures

China56 participantsStarted 2003-02

Plain-language summary

This study is designed to answer whether minimal invasive vessel clotting (angioembolization) or open surgery (retroperitoneal packing) is more effective for pelvic fractures with massive bleeding. Patients admitted at daytime (7am-5pm) are treated with angioembolization while patients admitted at nighttime (5pm to 7am) are treated with open surgery.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years – 65 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * multitrauma defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) \> 17 * dislocated pelvic fracture type B or C according to Tile\[10\] on emergency department pelvic radiograph * hemodynamic instability defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mmHg after administration of 4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC). Exclusion Criteria: * monotrauma, or ISS ≤ 17 * age \> 65 years * age \< 18 years

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Number of participants deceased occurring in-hospital during or after treatment with packing or embolization

Timeframe: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 weeks

Trial details

NCT IDNCT02535624

SponsorUppsala University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2013-02

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Shock, Hemorrhagic trials