CompletedNot Applicable

McGrath Mac Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Critical Care Unit

France371 participantsStarted 2015-05

Plain-language summary

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the rate of successful orotracheal intubation at first laryngoscopy will be higher in patients intubated with McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope compared to patients intubated with classical Macintosh laryngoscope in patients requiring an orotracheal intubation in ICU.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: • Requiring orotracheal intubation Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindication to orotracheal intubation * Time too short to allow inclusion and randomisation of patient (particularly cardiac arrest) * Minor (\<18 ) * Pregnant, parturient , or breast-feeding woman * Patient hospitalized without consent and/or deprived of liberty by court's decision * Patient under guardianship or curators * Lack of social insurance * Lack of informed consent * Concomitant inclusion in a trial whose primary endpoint focuses on intubation procedure

What they're measuring

Proportion of successful orotracheal intubation at first laryngoscopy

Timeframe: intubation procedure, an expected average of 15 minutes

Trial details

NCT IDNCT02413723

SponsorCentre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2015-11

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Intratracheal Intubation in Critical Care trials