Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effect of Embryonic Observation on the Gestation (PR… (NCT02372279) | Clinical Trial Compass
TerminatedNot Applicable
Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effect of Embryonic Observation on the Gestation (PROdE)
Stopped: The forecast regarding the number of patients that could enter the study were not met in the designated period
Spain193 participantsStarted 2015-02
Plain-language summary
In a conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, daily microscopic observation of embryos outside the incubator to assess their morphology and establish a selection process is performed. In this way it is possible to know which embryo or embryos have greater implantantion capacity and will be transferred to the uterus to obtain a viable pregnancy. However, these observations can produce deleterious effects on embryo development due to changes in temperature, pH and osmolarity of the culture media, as well as a negative effect of direct light microscope for observation. This project aims to test the hypothesis that non-embryonic observation produces a beneficial effect on embryo quality until day 5 of development (blastocyst stage) and, therefore, on rates of implantation and ongoing gestation, compared with the conventional protocol of observations under the inverted microscope on days two, three and five of development.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 50 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* First cycle of ART treatment with conventional IVF or ICSI with donated eggs.
* Normal uterine cavity and a single or double embryo transfer, always performed on day 5 at blastocyst stage.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients above 50 years old, patients that were diagnosed with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and/or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or uterine pathologies,
* Body mass index \>30 kg/m2.
* The use of seminal samples coming from donors or testicular origin.
* Cycles that included preimplantational genetic testing (PGT).
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.