Pronase Improves Efficacy of Chromoendoscopy Screening on Esophageal Cancer (NCT02030769) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Pronase Improves Efficacy of Chromoendoscopy Screening on Esophageal Cancer
China1,000 participantsStarted 2014-01
Plain-language summary
Lugol's solution staining was regarded as a gold standard to detect early superficial lesion during esophageal cancer screening using endoscopy. However, the sensitivity and specificity were influenced by mucus and food debris of esophagus. Pronase, a kind of protease, was previously shown to improve the visibility of gastrointestinal tract. It's unknown if the pre-treatment with pronase would also improve the quality of iodine staining in esophagus.A randomized double-blind clinical trial was designed to investigate whether or not pronase might improve detection rate of early esophageal lesion, especially high grade dysplasia and early cancer by improving the esophageal visibility.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients 60 years to 75 years old
* Patients less than 60 years old, but with one or multiple high risk factors for esophageal cancer including smoking and drinking addiction,family history of esophageal cancer, personal history of esophageal or head and neck malignancies, previous endoscopy documenting iodine void superficial lesion.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Allergy to iodine or any other medicine which used in this trial.
* Previous endoscopy revealing advanced esophageal cancer or other non-superficial lesions.
* Conditions interfering visibility of endoscope including gastrointestinal obstruction and upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
* Anatomic variation by surgery.
* Pregnancy
* Other conditions which investigator consider the patient at high risk for complications.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Detection rate of high grade dysplasia and carcinoma in iodine void lesion