TerminatedPhase 2

Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia

Stopped: slow accrual of participants

Singapore14 participantsStarted 2014-01

Plain-language summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment in the treatment of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) (i.e. \> or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause mortality. Our secondary aim is to compare clinical failure rates of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment and to compare time to microbiological clearance in patients treated with daptomycin versus those treated with vancomycin. Our primary hypothesis is that Daptomycin treatment is superior to vancomycin treatment in reducing mortality from BSIs due to MRSA with high vancomycin MIC from 25% to 10%.

Who can participate

Age range

21 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Exclusion criteria

. .Isolation of a significant organism other than MRSA from index blood cultures or blood cultures taken up to two weeks prior to enrolment and/or for which the patient is still on treatment.
. .Chest x-ray at baseline consistent with pneumonia AND at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: New onset or worsening cough, purulent sputum or increased suctioning requirements, dyspnea/tachypnea or respiratory rate \> 30/min, hypoxemia or worsening gas exchange as determined by study investigator.)

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

All cause mortality

Timeframe: 60 days

Trial details

NCT IDNCT01975662

SponsorSingapore General Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2015-12

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Bacteremia Due to Staphylococcus Aureus trials