Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre, Open-label, Phase II / III Study to Assess Efficacy and Saf… (NCT01941329) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 2/3
Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre, Open-label, Phase II / III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Intravitreal Injections Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) Versus PRP in Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects With High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
France, Italy, Portugal94 participantsStarted 2014-04
Plain-language summary
This study is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, open label study that intents to compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg Intravitreal (ITV) injections plus Panretinal Photocoagulation versus Panretinal Photocoagulation alone in the regression of the neovascularization area in patients with High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy over a 12-month treatment period.
One of the major complications of the diabetes mellitus is Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), one of the leading causes of visual impairment in working age in industrialized countries. Longer diabetes duration and poor glycaemic and blood pressure control are strongly associated with Diabetic Retinopathy. The overall prevalence of any form of Diabetic Retinopathy is 34.4% and 6.96% corresponds to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR). Therefore, approximately 93 million people have Diabetic Retinopathy and 17 million of them have Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
It has been shown that treatment with repeated injections of ranibizumab can improve visual acuity in patients with PDR. Further, , the standard PRP treatment of PDR remains unsatisfactory. The knowledge of the mechanisms of this retinal complication is incomplete and, therefore, efforts should be done to understand and characterize patients' eyes response to combined treatments.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the standard treatment for PDR (i.e. Panretinal Photocoagulation) with Panretinal Photocoagulation treatment combined with ITV injections of ranibizumab since it is expected that anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment with ITV injections will increase the rate of success of Panretinal Photocoagulation in regression of neovascularization with improved final visual acuity.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR-PDR); Neovascularization in the disc (NVD) ≥ 1/4 disc area (DA) OR Neovascularization elsewhere (NVE) ≥ 1/2 DA; NVE \< 1/2 DA + vitreous and/or pre-retinal haemorrhage and/or rubeosis; NVD \<1/4 DA + vitreous and/or pre-retinal haemorrhage and/or rubeosis;
* BCVA at baseline ≥ 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters score (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/320);
* Type I or Type II diabetic subjects of either gender;
* Age ≥ 18 years;
* Ability to provide written informed consent;
* Ability to return for all clinical trial visits;
Exclusion Criteria:
* Any intraocular surgery within 6 months before trial enrolment, including:
Prior scatter (panretinal) or focal/grid photocoagulation; Eyes who have received yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser, or peripheral retinal cryoablation, or laser retinopexy (for retinal tears only);
* Fibrovascular proliferation with retinal traction;
* Other cause of retinal NV (retinal vein occlusion, radiation retinopathy or others);
* Atrophy/scarring/fibrosis/ hard exudates involving the centre of the macula;
* Significant media opacities or inadequate pupillary dilation, which might interfere with visual acuity, assessment of toxicity or fundus photography;
* Any likelihood that the subject will require cataract surgery within the following 1 year;
* Diabetic macular edema (DME) with central involvement, i.e., central macular thickness (Central Point…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Regression of neovascularization
Timeframe: 12-month treatment
Trial details
NCT IDNCT01941329
SponsorAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image