TerminatedNot Applicable

Comparative Study Between Bilateral and Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia

Stopped: intermittent evaluation of results: high incendence of complications

Belgium25 participantsStarted 2012-12

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this study is to compare unilateral spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric Prilocaine with "classical bilateral spinal anesthesia" using plain Prilocaine according to block characteristics and quality of micturition, standardized to the subjects own functional bladder capacity. Our hypothesis is that unilateral spinal anesthesia will provide faster time to micturtition and discharge, lesser hypotension and lesser micturition problems.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years – 60 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * spinal anaesthesia * surgery\<60 minutes Exclusion Criteria: * preexisting micturition problems * surgery lower abdomen/pelvis * bmi\>30 * mental problems * kidney disease * neurologic disease

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

time to micturition (minutes)

Timeframe: up to 360 minutes

discharge time ( minutes)

Timeframe: up to 360 minutes

regression motor block

Timeframe: up to 240 minutes

Trial details

NCT IDNCT01877356

SponsorUniversity Hospital, Antwerp

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2014-08

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Anesthesia; Adverse Effect, Spinal and Epidural trials