CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Incidence Between Two Techniques

United States40 participantsStarted 2013-03

Plain-language summary

Sinus augmentation, also referred to as a sinus lift or a sinus graft, is an oral surgery procedure where bone is added to the upper jaw near the molars. The goal of the surgery is to add enough bone material onto the upper jaw to support the placement of a dental implant. The augmentation and the dental implant placement will be done at the same time to avoid the need for two surgeries. This is standard of care. The purpose of this study is to compare any problems and patient comfort levels following surgery. Subjects will be randomly placed into one of two groups: the internal lift group or the external lift group. Both types of surgery are routinely done at our clinic. Usually the type of procedure (internal or external) is based on the dentist's preference. Investigators are doing this study to compare them to each other to see if one is more comfortable for the subject than the other or if they are equal. It is predicted that the two techniques may differ when it comes to complications during the procedure, patient discomfort following the procedure and patient complications in the weeks and months after the procedure. This last comparison has not yet been studied, and surgeons often choose the technique that they prefer from their own experiences. With this research study researchers hope to gain valuable information that will help surgeons' decisions in the future. * Investigators hypothesize that external sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement (external technique) will have a higher rate of Schneiderian membrane perforation than the internal sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement (internal technique). * Investigators hypothesize that the internal technique is associated with more discomfort for the subject compared with the external technique. * Investigators hypothesize that the external technique will result in more severe pain/bleeding/swelling than the internal technique. * Investigators hypothesize that the internal technique has a higher incidence of complications that occur between three weeks and three months postoperatively compared with the external technique. * Investigators hypothesize that the external technique has a higher amount of analgesics taken postoperatively compared with the internal technique

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years of age or older * patients treatment planned for sinus lift augmentation and implant placement, with a height of the crestal alveolar bone measured in the middle of the edentulous space between four and six mm (calibrated measurements recorded on existing panoramic radiograph) * the length of the edentulous span is one or two teeth * non-smokers Exclusion Criteria: * patients who have had a previous sinus lift augmentation procedure * pathology present within the sinus (sinusitis, polyps, neoplasia, mucoceles, etc.) or any deformity/radiation therapy to the sinus * medically compromised patients contraindicated to dental surgery at TUSDM periodontal clinic including uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥7, lab results from within the past 6 months will be reviewed, patient without lab results from within the past 6 months will be excluded) and/or uncontrolled hypertension (more than stage II, ≥160/110) * patients with medical condition that could potentially affect wound healing (e.g., self-reported Hepatitis B or C, self-reported HIV) * patients with metabolic bone disease such as Paget's Disease or osteoporosis * patients who are currently taking bisphosphonates or steroids * patients who are currently pregnant according to self-report (standard of care in the TUSDM Periodontology clinic for such procedures) * current smokers

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Compare incidence of Schneiderian membrane perforation

Timeframe: 1-3 months after surgical procedure

Trial details

NCT IDNCT01832025

SponsorTufts University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2016-09

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Edentulous Posterior Maxilla trials