"Cognitive Functional Therapy" vs. Manual Therapy for Non-specific Low Back Pain (NCT01794962) | Clinical Trial Compass
TerminatedNot Applicable
"Cognitive Functional Therapy" vs. Manual Therapy for Non-specific Low Back Pain
Denmark24 participantsStarted 2012-10
Plain-language summary
This is a pilot study. Chronic LBP is a major health care problem in Denmark. Few patients receive a specific diagnosis, leaving the majority of patients diagnosed with non specific low back pain(NSLBP). Classification systems can help to guide the treatment of NSLBP. This pilot study will compare manual therapy (manipulation and soft tissue treatment)and exercises to a classification based biopsychosocial intervention (a cognitive/functional approach) as described by Peter O'Sullivan, on a subgroup called "flexion pattern"
This pilot study has three specific aims:
(i) To determine the mean and standard deviation on the numerical rating scale of participants in this setting who have a motor control flexion pattern, so that sample size calculations for a fully powered randomized controlled trial could be performed.
(ii) To test the logistical and practical procedures that will be required to perform a fully powered randomized controlled trial using these two treatments.
(iii) To gain a preliminary estimate of any difference in the effect of these two treatments, so as to determine if the results of a fully powered randomized controlled trial might be clinically important and therefore worthwhile undertaking
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants must be between 18 - 65 years old and have, with a history of low back pain more than three months.
The primary pain area from T12- to the gluteal folds. Low back pain must be provoked by movements and/or physical activities. Average pain intensity in the last two weeks must be al least: 4/10 on Pain numerical rating scale Participants must have adequate comprehension and expressing the Danish language.
Participants must be classified as having a "flexion pattern".
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants must not have been sick listed for more than 4 months; have an acute exacerbation of LBP, surgery of low limb within last 4 months or hip or knee osteoarthritis limiting loading of knee and hip flexion.
Follow medical conditions are also excluding participants:
A history of spinal surgery Radicular pain (disc prolapse or foraminal stenosis): non painful symptoms in leg, clinical signs of altered nerve conduction) Spinal stenosis A previous history psychiatric disease Current pregnancy Widespread non-specific pain (for filling criteria for fibromyalgia) Imaging confirming spondylolisthesis
Other diseases:
Rheumatoid arthritis ankylosing spondylitis neurologic disease infection cancer previous history of osteoporosis The patient can´t be classified as having a flexion pattern Lack of compliance during the intervention: if a patient fails to turn up for more than one appointment with out prior notice.
\-
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.