A Noninferiority RCT Comparing Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment for ER-stress Positive Weber-B… (NCT01758796) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
A Noninferiority RCT Comparing Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment for ER-stress Positive Weber-B Unimalleolar Fractures
Finland126 participantsStarted 2013-01
Plain-language summary
Current gold standard treatment for unstable (those found unstable in external rotation (ER) stress testing Weber B-type, Lauge-Hansen supination-external rotation type IV) ankle fractures is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with semitubular plates and screws. However, there is some preliminary evidence to suggest that these type of fibula fractures can be managed non-operatively with comparable functional outcome. The aim of this randomized, non-inferiority trial is to assess whether non-operative treatment (cast immobilisation) yields a non-inferior functional outcome compared to surgery with no excess harms (primarily, fracture and wound healing problems and infection).
Who can participate
Age range
16 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Weber B unimalleolar ankle fracture
* Age: 16 years or older
* Voluntary
* Operated within 7 days of the trauma
* Walking without aid before accident
Exclusion Criteria:
* Peripheral neuropathy
* Pilon fracture
* Bilateral ankle fracture
* Simultaneous crural fracture
* Pathological fracture
* Active infection around the ankle
* A previous ankle fracture or significant medial ligament trauma
* Lives outside our hospital district or a foreigner
* Co-operation is insufficient
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.