IPV in Moderate to Severe Chronic Malnourished 9-12 Month Old Children in Karachi. (NCT01695798) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 4
IPV in Moderate to Severe Chronic Malnourished 9-12 Month Old Children in Karachi.
Pakistan840 participantsStarted 2012-10
Plain-language summary
Chronic malnutrition is associated with lack of effective gut immunity which is a possible explanation for why we see polio cases among a proportion of children who have received 7 or more doses of OPV.Our proposed idea is to evaluate if IPV antigen given later in life may act together to boost humoral and mucosal immunity in children belonging to low-income background in Karachi who have moderate to severe chronic malnutrition (height for age Z score less than -2SD). We also intend to compare eIPV + OPV with OPV only in non-malnourished infants at 9 -12 month of age. Thus, the proposed study is a combination of two trials, with study population stratified by nutritional status, each with a reference arm (bOPV) and an experimental arm (bOPV plus IPV).
Who can participate
Age range
9 Months – 12 Months
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Infant aged 9 - 12 months of age
* Resident of the study area for last 3 month at the time of enrolment
* Parent/guardian provides informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Infant already enrolled in any other polio intervention study.
* Infant found acutely ill at the time of enrolment, requiring emergent medical care
* Infant with moderate and severe acute malnutrition, defined by a very low weight for height (below -2z and -3z scores of the median WHO growth standards respectively).
* Refusal of blood testing
* Receipt of supplementary dose of OPV within 4 weeks of first study visit
* Infant with certain medical conditions i.e., cerebral palsy, syndromic infants, infants on corticosteroids because of any medical illness, thrombocytopenia (contraindication of intramuscular injections), malignancies and infant with primary immunodeficiency
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Compare the difference in seropositivity and mean geometric titers between baseline sera and post-intervention sera (after 1 month) in chronically malnourished and non-malnourished infants (9-12 month)
Timeframe: 12 months
2
Compare the effect of IPV on seropositivity between chronically malnourished and normally nourished 9-12 month old infants.