TerminatedPhase 2/3

Daptomycin + Meropenem Versus Ceftazidime in the Treatment of Nosocomial Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Stopped: Decision of independent monitoring committee after interim analysis: Risk of failure significantly higher in ceftazidime group.

Italy32 participantsStarted 2010-10

Plain-language summary

Nosocomial spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is frequently caused by multi drug resistant bacteria. Standard treatment of SBP could be ineffective. The aim of the study is to compare daptomycin + meropenem vs ceftazidime in the treatment of nosocomial SBP.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years – 75 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites * Meets all criteria for nosocomial SBP as outlined below * Ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cells count \>250/mm3 * Onset of signs and symptoms of infection after 72 hours of hospitalization Exclusion Criteria: * Hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria * Abdominal surgery within 4 weeks * Evidence of secondary peritonitis, pancreatitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis * Significant heart or respiratory failure * Allergy to ceftazidime, meropenem or daptomycin

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

The primary end-point of the study is the response to therapy

Timeframe: 48 hours and seven days

Trial details

NCT IDNCT01455246

SponsorUniversity of Padova

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2014-04

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Cirrhosis trials

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years – 75 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.