CompletedNot Applicable

Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Cystocele Repair Using Polypropylene Mesh or Porcine Dermis

United States99 participantsStarted 2006-01

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the success rate of cystocele repair using polypropylene mesh or porcine dermis compared to that of anterior colporrhaphy in a prospective randomized fashion. The study will be performed in a randomized, prospective, single-blinded fashion.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years

SexFEMALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Stage 2 or \> anterior vaginal prolapse requiring surgical correction. * \>18 years old * willing to return for follow-up visits. Exclusion Criteria: * Less than stage II or \> anterior vaginal prolapse, * decline to participate, * pregnant or contemplating future pregnancy, * anti-incontinence procedure other than midurethral sling (ie, Burch colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, or needle suspension) is planned as part of their surgical procedures, * any contra-indication to receiving mesh or porcine dermis.

What they're measuring

Prospective Randomized Trial of Anterior Colporrhaphy Vs. Cystocele Repair Using Polypropylene Mesh or Porcine Dermis

Timeframe: 2 years

Trial details

NCT IDNCT01393171

SponsorKaiser Permanente

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2015-12

Results submitted2019-10-14

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse trials