RecruitingNot Applicable

Revascularization Strategies in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and Severe Coronary Artery Disease

Poland1,000 participantsStarted 2025-08-25

Plain-language summary

MILESTONE STUDY is dedicated to problems connected with patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and/or with left main narrowing who present symptoms of acute ischemia. For such kind of patients according to current ACC/AHA guidelines CABG (surgical revascularization) is recommended as a treatment method. In comparison with CABG, recent studies have shown that PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) is associated with a lower rate of periprocedural adverse events and similar long term event-free survival in patients with left main disease. Our latest non randomized registry and randomized LEMANS study, comparing LMCA (left main coronary artery) stenting with CABG confirmed above findings. LEMANS ACS (acute coronary syndrome) retrospective registry of patients with UPLMCA (unprotected LMCA) disease and non ST elevation ACS showed lower 30 day and trend toward lower one year mortality after PCI when compared with CABG. It should be stressed, that acute ischemia substantially increase the risk of CABG. In fact, there are limited data on the outcome of ULMCA stenting or CABG in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Similarly, all randomized studies comparing PCI vs CABG in multivessel disease included mainly patients with stable angina, small cohort of patients with unstable angina and they excluded patients with non ST elevation Myocardial infarction. In the SYNTAX study -largest PCI vs CABG trial, randomized patients were patients with low perioperative risk (logistic EUROSCORE \<5) and ACS patients routinely excluded. High perioperative risk patients were included only in PCI registry.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must meet ALL of the inclusion criteria to be considered for the trial. If ANY of the exclusion criteria are met, the subject is excluded from the trial and cannot be randomized. * Age over 18 years, * Written patient consent, * Acute Coronary Syndrome without ST-segment elevation of high, intermediate and low risk, including NSTEMI and unstable angina requiring urgent (within 72 hours) invasive strategy, * Qualification for invasive treatment, * Multivessel coronary disease, defined as angiographic narrowing \>50%DS on investigator's visual assessment in at least two major coronary artery territories (RCA, LAD, LCX), including involvement of the proximal segment of the left anterior descending artery or three-vessel disease with a Syntax Score \< 33. Intermediate lesions (40-70%) will need to be assessed with either FFR, iFR, or VFFR). Patient may have left main coronary artery disease, defined as narrowing \>50%DS (but this is not obligatory). For borderline changes, IVUS (MLA \<6 mm2 or iFR=\<0,90 or FFR=\<0,80, with an anatomic Syntax Score \<33 will be decisive, * Feasibility of complete revascularization on both the CABG and PCI sides, * Consent within the Heart Team for both CABG by the cardiothoracic surgeon and PCI by the interventional cardiologist. Exclusion Criteria: * Age under 18 years, * ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or new left bundle branch block (LBBB), * Stable coronary syndrome, * Single- or two-vessel …

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

MACCE - Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebral Events

Timeframe: One year after revascularization procedure

Trial details

NCT IDNCT01311323

SponsorAmerican Heart of Poland

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2028-12

Contact for this trial

Natalia Pydyn, PhD

+48 667 132 233 natalia.pydyn@ahop.pl

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease trials