TerminatedNot Applicable

Subcapital and Shaft Fractures of the 5. Metacarpal

Stopped: problems to include patients, patients not showing up at check-up

Norway39 participantsStarted 2011-01

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this study is to find out the best treatment for subcapital and shaft fractures of the 5. metacarpal. It is a prospective randomized multicenter study. Comparing only fractures dislocated more than 30 degrees. One group will be operated with intramedullary pins and one group will be treated conservatively with reduction and then Plaster of Paris for 3 weeks. All patients will be followed up after 3, 6 and 12 months.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years – 45 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * voluntarily, only isolated subcapital og shaft fracture of the 5. metacarpal,operated/reduction within 10 days of injury,not intoxicated,degree of fracture dislocation minimum 30 degrees measured on the X-ray. Exclusion Criteria: * open fractures, fractures of the head of 5. metacarpal/intraarticular fractures, patients who wants to be followed up at Hospitals outside the study area, earlier injury of the hand that might have influence on function.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Clinical outcome comparing conservative and operative treatment of subcapital and shaft fractures of the 5. metacarpal

Timeframe: 2 -3 years

Trial details

NCT IDNCT01242982

SponsorSt. Olavs Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2012-05

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Fracture trials