A Trial to Establish the Feasibility of Combining Either the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor AC220,CXCR… (NCT01236144) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 1/2
A Trial to Establish the Feasibility of Combining Either the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor AC220,CXCR4 Inhibitor Plerixafor or HSP90 Inhibitor Ganetespib With Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome.
United Kingdom113 participantsStarted 2011-04
Plain-language summary
The AML18 Pilot Trial will evaluate the feasibility of three interventions that are planned to be included in the forthcoming NCRI AML18 Trial. One intervention will be to evaluate combining the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor AC220 with three courses of standard DAE (Daunorubicin, Ara-C, Etoposide). AC220 will be given following each treatment course, daily by mouth for 7, 14 or 21 days. AC220 will be evaluated at 3 dose levels of 60, 90 and 135 mg flat dose. A 4th dose level of 40 mg will be introduced should patients not respond well to 60 mg. The second intervention to be tested is the combination of the CXCR4 inhibitor Plerixafor with up to three courses of the chemotherapy combination of DClo (Daunorubicin, Clofarabine). Patients/investigators will be able to choose which intervention to enter. Depending on recruitment requirements, only one intervention might be available at any one time. The third intervention Patients will receive 3 treatments of 100 mg of ganetespib on days 1, 8 and 15 of each course where day 1 is the first day of the chemotherapy. The chemotherapy will be DAE/DAE/DA. Three courses of chemotherapy will be given each of which will be associated with 3 administrations of ganetespib.
Who can participate
Age range
60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* They have one of the forms of acute myeloid leukaemia, except Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia or CML in blast crisis as defined by the WHO Classification (Appendix A) - this can be any type of de novo or secondary AML - or high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, defined as greater than 10% marrow blasts (RAEB-2).
* Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN (upper limit of normal)
* White cell count of \<30 x 109/L at diagnosis (for Plerixafor option only). If WCC is \>30 x 109/l patients in the Plerixafor pilot should have the WCC reduced to \<30 x 109/L using Hydroxycarbamide to avoid the risk of hyperleucocytosis
* Serum potassium, magnesium, and calcium levels should be at least within institutional normal limits, and every effort should be made to keep potassium at institutional normal limits, and every effort should be made to keep potassium concentrations above 4.0 mEq/dL, and serum calcium at normal concentration.
* Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN (upper limit of normal) and serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × ULN
* Sexually mature males must agree to use an adequate and medically accepted method of contraception throughout the study if their sexual partners are women of child bearing potential (WOCBP).
* Over 60 years of age
* Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* They have previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy for AML. \[Hydroxycarbamide, or similar low-dose therapy, to control the white count pr…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Response (CR, CRi, PR) achievement, and reasons for failure